ConnSENSE Bulletin Banner

Home | What's New | Articles Archive | Washington Archive | Resources Archive | Positions Archive | Reviews Archive | Links | Conferences | About Us

CEC Calls on the Environmental Protection Agency to Reverse Its Position Allowing Chemical Testing on Children Who Are Abused and Neglected

Lynda Van Kuren
lyndav@cec.sped.org

The Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) says the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) proposal to allow testing of chemicals and pesticides on children who are abused and neglected is abhorrent. Though the EPA says it will protect pregnant women and children, its new rules on human testing include "exemptions" that open the door to using children and pregnant women as test subjects. The EPA's rules state that testing of humans can occur under the following circumstances:

  • It is not reasonable to obtain parental permission, such as in the case of abused and neglected children.
  • The research is "ethically deficient" but crucial to protecting the public health.
  • There is a direct benefit to the child being tested and the parents or guardians agree, even if there is more than minimal health risk to the child.
  • The studies are performed in countries that have few or no ethical standards for testing as long as the tests are not done directly for the EPA.

"CEC is appalled that the EPA has taken such a position," says CEC's Interim Executive Director Bruce Ramirez. "These rules endanger the lives and health of children who have no one to protect them. If this goes forward, we, as a nation, have moved backwards, running roughshod over those who are vulnerable or simply unaware of the ramifications of the tests being administered."

CEC has submitted comments to the EPA expressing its hope that the EPA will "uphold high ethical standards and protect all children from becoming subjects of toxic experiments."

This is not the first time human testing has come under scrutiny. Studies by the National Academy of Sciences and the Joint Subcommittee of the Science Advisory Board have expressed great concern over using children as subjects and stated that there are too many unknowns to justify such studies. Also, in 1998 EPA Administrator Carol Browne issued a moratorium on human experimentation. The Bush administration reversed the moratorium.

Send your comments on using children who are abused and neglected for chemical testing to opp-docket@epa.gov, Attention: Docket ID Number OPP-2003-0132 by Dec. 12, 2005. CEC has a draft letter on this issue on its Legislative Action Center, http://capwiz.com/cek/home/