ConnSENSE Bulletin Banner

Home | What's New | Articles Archive | Washington Archive | Resources Archive | Positions Archive | Reviews Archive | Links | Conferences | About Us

Full Funding Bill Introduced - Action Alert!

  • Rep. Bass Introduces IDEA Full Funding Bill - Action Alert!
  • FY ı05 Budget Update

  • IES Issues Guide on Evidence-Based Education

  • CEC Welcomes Troy Justesen as He Takes Helm of OSERS

  • Ongoing Feature -- Presidential Candidate Positions for 2004



  • Rep. Bass Introduces IDEA Full Funding Bill

    Rep. Charles Bass (R-NH) on February 11 introduced H.R. 3802, the ³IDEA Full-Funding Act of 2004.² This bill is similar to the bill that Senators Hagel and Harkin introduced in the Senate last year. The bill would amend part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to provide full Federal funding of such part, to provide an exception to the local maintenance of effort requirements, and for other purposes.

    Along with Rep. Bass, Rep. Jeb Bradley from New Hampshire, Rep. Mike Ferguson from New Jersey, and Rep. Rob Simmons from Connecticut have co-sponsored the bill, which was referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce for consideration.

    Action to Take. Itıs important that we get as many members of Congress to co-sign this important piece of legislation BEFORE the House and Senate conference their individual IDEA reauthorization bills. CEC has put a letter on its Legislative Action Center that you can send to your Representative, urging him or her to co-sponsor H.R. 3802. Simply go to http://capwiz.com/cek/issues/alert/?alertid=5091656&type=CO and enter in your zip code to send your messages. Let your members of Congress know how important it is to fully fund IDEA!!!!


    FY ı05 Budget Update

    As we discussed in our February 4th Update, President Bush released his proposed FY ı05 Budget earlier this month. CEC is, at the very least, disappointed in the Administrationıs lack of commitment to increase funding for programs that support children with disabilities and those with gifts and talents.

    Luckily, the Presidentıs proposed figures are not written in stone. Congress may choose to follow Bushıs budget request very closely when determining appropriations amounts for federal programs, or they may choose to set their own priorities and establish their own levels of spending.

    Congress will take up the Budget Resolution in March. The Budget Resolution is only a blueprint for spending; it does not become "law" and so does not go to the President for his signature or veto. However, the budget is important for determining whether there will be overall increases in discretionary funding so that individual programs can receive increases through the appropriations process in the early summer.

    Reportedly, the conservative Republican Study Committee and the Tuesday Group of moderate Republicans unveiled 12 "consensus principles to reduce spending" recently at a Republican Conference meeting. At the plan's core is an annual joint (House and Senate) budget resolution that would be signed by the President and have the force of law. Spending that exceeds caps would be designated as "uncontrolled debt" by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), triggering across-the-board cuts in spending for all programs except Social Security and Medicare. It would narrow budget functions to four instead of ten and create a "rainy day" account for emergency spending. It would also reintroduce pay-as-you-go requirements, allowing points of order against spending not included in the budget; limit advance appropriations; impose program sunsets; establish a bipartisan commission to recommend elimination of wasteful spending; and grant the president authority to rescind wasteful spending, subject to congressional approval, among other things.

    At the conference meeting, conservatives reportedly agreed that Congress should cut discretionary spending by 1%, excluding Defense and Homeland Security, and mandatory spending should also be cut by 1%.

    Representative Michael Castle (R-DE), co-chairman of the Tuesday Group, indicated that, although conservative and moderate Republicans are not united on spending cuts, they agree that the President's levels should be seen as a ceiling and perhaps programs should be cut below those levels.

    The Republican Main Street Partnership, another group of Republican Moderates, have reportedly announced that the top issues on their agenda are increasing funding for education and the National Institutes of Health in FY Œ05.

    Reportedly, the White House has asserted that it was determined to pass President Bush's FY Œ05 budget plan. White House Press Secretary McClellan stated that Bush's FY Œ05 budget significantly reduced discretionary spending.

    House Republican leadership still hopes to complete its budget resolution by March 15, and have both chambers pass a final budget resolution by the statutory April 15 deadline.


    IES Issues Guide on Evidence-Based Education

    The U.S. Department of Educationıs Institute of Education Sciences (IES), through the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), has released a guide on evidence-based education. Entitled Identifying and Implementing Educational Practices Supported By Rigorous Evidence: A User Friendly Guide, this Guide seeks to provide educational practitioners with user-friendly tools to distinguish practices supported by rigorous evidence from those that are not.

    According to information from the Department:

    The field of K-12 education contains a vast array of educational interventions ­ such as reading and math curricula, schoolwide reform programs, after-school programs, and new educational technologies ­ that claim to be able to improve educational outcomes and, in many cases, to be supported by evidence. This evidence often consists of poorly designed and/or advocacy-driven studies. State and local education officials and educators must sort through a myriad of such claims to decide which interventions merit consideration for their schools and classrooms. Many of these practitioners have seen interventions, introduced with great fanfare as being able to produce dramatic gains, come and go over the years, yielding little in the way of positive and lasting change ­ a perception confirmed by the flat achievement results over the past 30 years in the National Assessment of Educational Progress long-term trend.

    The federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, and many federal K-12 grant programs, call on educational practitioners to use ³scientifically-based research² to guide their decisions about which interventions to implement. As discussed below, we believe this approach can produce major advances in the effectiveness of American education. Yet many practitioners have not been given the tools to distinguish interventions supported by scientifically rigorous evidence from those that are not. This Guide is intended to serve as a user-friendly resource that the education practitioner can use to identify and implement evidence-based interventions, so as to improve educational and life outcomes for the children they serve.

    To read the full text of the Guide, go to: http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/rigorousevid/index.html


    CEC Welcomes Troy Justesen as He Takes Helm of OSERS

    Troy R. Justesen has been delegated the authority to carry out the functions of the position of Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) in the U.S. Department of Education.

    In this position, Justesen will serve as the principal adviser to the U.S. Secretary of Education on all Departmental matters related to special education and rehabilitative services and provide overall direction, coordination and leadership to OSERSı four components, the Office of the Assistant Secretary (OAS), the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP), the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) and the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR).

    As we stated in a CEC Update late last year, Robert H. Pasternack resigned the position of Assistant Secretary of OSERS effective January 2nd 2004.

    Serving people with disabilities, especially students, has been an underlying theme throughout Justesenıs career. From teaching as an elementary educator to reaching out to students, teachers and employers through the White House, Justesen has amassed an extensive background in education, employment and disability policy. Justesen is recognized as a national disability leader and uses a motorized scooter for mobility.

    Before coming to OSERS, Justesen served as the Associate Director for Domestic Policy at the White House, assisting the Offices of Domestic Policy and Public Liaison with the implementation of President George W. Bushıs New Freedom Initiative (NFI) and other initiatives important to people with disabilities.

    Working on issues of importance to students with disabilities, Justesen also served as the Deputy Executive Director of the Presidentıs Commission on Excellence in Special Education (PCESE). In this capacity, he was the principal draft writer of a report to the President, ³A New Era: Revitalizing Special Education for Children and their Families,² recommending policy reform for the 2003 reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). As Deputy Executive Director, Justesen had specific responsibilities for advising each member of the Commission about all aspects of regular and special education policy and legislation under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the Rehabilitation Act.

    Prior to his work with the Commission, Justesen served for more than three years as an Education Policy Analyst with the U.S. Department of Education in the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP), providing expert technical assistance on the implementation of the IDEA to parents, educators, and state and local education agency administrators.

    In the late 1990s, Justesen served as an ADA/504 compliance officer and program director, providing services to students. He also has taught as an adjunct professor of special education, supervising field experiences for undergraduate and graduate students.

    Justesenıs career began with the Northern Utah Independent Living Center, where he served as the first Northern Utah Assistive Technology Coordinator for the Utah Assistive Technology Project. The assistive technology project initiated a state-level systems change effort to increase the affordability and usability of assistive technology for individuals with disabilities.

    CEC looks forward to working with Mr. Justesen in this new capacity.


    Presidential Candidate Positions for 2004

    As you know, 2004 is a Presidential election year. Americans will have the opportunity to choose between President Bush, whomever the Democratic Party nominates, and any other major candidates for President. Below, CEC is presenting the special education and disability-related records and agendas of the three front-running Democratic Presidential candidates. Over the next few weeks, we will continue to update you with any relevant information, including campaign-related Internet links, which the leading Democratic candidates may provide on these issues.

    Since President Bush will be the Republican nominee for President, please see the following Administration Websites to learn more about his positions on these issues: http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/newfreedom/, http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/education/
    http://www.ed.gov/index.jhtml

    * NOTE: CEC is bipartisan and does not endorse any candidate running for government office. We are sharing the candidatesı positions on special education and disability issues for your information only.

    As of right now, there are three Democratic front-runners who are vying for the Democratic nomination: John Kerry, Howard Dean, and John Edwards.

    John Kerry's Policy Platform and Vision for America

    John Kerry has stated the following concerning Freedom, Independence, and choices for Americans with Disabilities:

    All Americans have an inherent right to be treated as equal citizens of our nation. Now more than ever, people with disabilities can live fuller, more productive lives if afforded the right opportunities and supports. John Kerry's plan will strengthen Medicaid and Medicare, fully fund IDEA, and construct creative solutions to the transportation, technology, and housing needs of individuals with disabilities. Kerry believes that the government should not be investing in tax giveaways for the wealthiest Americans while the IDEA is underfunded and Medicaid is in danger of being weakened, and he will fight the far right's efforts to undermine the Americans with Disabilities Act.

    Kerry goes more in-depth in his positions concerning IDEA issues, as follows:

    Creating Educational Opportunities
    If the goal of the disability-rights movement is to create opportunities for Americans with disabilities equal to those of their peers without disabilities, then education is the key that opens those doors. Empowering Americans with disabilities to be productive, job-holding, tax-paying citizens is both a moral obligation and an economic win.

    John Kerry's plan includes:

    (1) MANDATORY, FULL FUNDING FOR IDEA. This year, full funding would have cost an additional $13 billion. President Bush puts a higher priority on tax cuts for the wealthy and is picking up less than half of the federal tab. Kids with disabilities still are not getting the services they need. IDEA must be fully funded.

    (2) STRONG ENFORCEMENT AND REAL COMPLIANCE WITH IDEA. Situations involving non-compliance, no matter how unintended, cannot be resolved so long as they go undetected. Strong enforcement means measuring key educational and functional indicators on both the State and local levels, requiring every State to file a federal compliance plan, deploying an array of tools to ensure compliance, and as a last line of defense, making sure that all procedural safeguards are defended. Funding must be provided to make this data collection and oversight possible.

    (3) MAINTENANCE OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION. No Child Left Behind is far from perfect, but accountability for special education students is long overdue. We must do a better job educating our school in the use of alternative assessments and IEP timetables. John Kerry will direct the Secretary of Education to provide states with guidance that has been sorely lacking under the Bush Administration.

    (4) PROMOTING PARTICIPATION IN SERVICE LEARNING. Involving special education children in service learning programs provides a wonderful chance to be an integral part of a team, uncover hidden talents, and share meaningful experiences with their peers without disabilities. John Kerry will work to spread such programs cross the country and encourage efforts within the Corporation for National and Community Service (AmeriCorps) to reach out to individuals with disabilities.

    (5) IMPROVING ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION. John Kerry is committed to equipping the next generation of students with disabilities with the tools to succeed through improving access to higher education. His plan will improve transitional planning, promote access and awareness in disability services, improve service coordination, provide work-study alternatives, and collect data on students with disabilities to provide a true scientific understanding of the realities on the ground. He would also direct the Secretary of Education to solicit disability status and accommodation-cost data so that tools to take further meaningful action are available.

    For more information about John Kerryıs positions, go to: http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/awd


    Howard Deanıs Disability Rights Platform

    Howard Dean has stated the following concerning the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and other disability-related issues:

    ³The ADA is one of the most important civil rights laws ever passed by Congress. By requiring public buildings to be accessible and by outlawing discrimination on the basis of disability in employment and public accommodations, the ADA has provided new opportunities for more than 54 million people living with disabilities. The best way to mark the anniversary of the passage of the ADA is to build upon its success by expanding the horizons of Americans with disabilities.

    "First of all, we need to restore the full promise of the ADA itself. Right wing judges, led by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Scalia and Thomas, have narrowed the scope of the ADA. They have severely limited the employment protections in the Act, dismissing cases brought by qualified disabled people, and interpreting the Constitution to shield state governments from lawsuits seeking to enforce rights under the ADA. President Bush has nominated judges like Jeffrey Sutton and William Pryor whose advocacy has undermined the ADA and other civil rights laws.

    "If I am elected President, I will appoint judges who understand that civil rights laws must be interpreted broadly, and who do not erect imaginary constitutional barriers to the enforcement of civil rights. Congress may also need to amend the ADA to overcome adverse court decisions.

    "Looking beyond the ADA, there is much more that can be done to enhance the status of Americans with disabilities. As President I would pursue a bold and aggressive disability agenda, including the following:

    -Fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). When IDEA was enacted, Congress promised to pay 40 percent of the average per-pupil expenditure educating children with disabilities. Federal funding has never come close to meeting that promise; in FY 2002, federal funds constituted 18 percent of this cost. This has been a burden on local ratepayers and has led to diminished services many note takers, interpreters and other individuals hired to assist persons with disabilities in the classroom have been terminated. The federal government should fully fund its promised share of IDEA.

    -Enact the Family Opportunity Act. This proposal would expand Medicaid coverage to children with severe disabilities living in middle income families. Currently, such families face an untenable dilemma: stay impoverished, place their child in an out-of-home placement, or relinquish custody to secure needed health care services. My health care plan would expand insurance coverage for children up to 300% of poverty and this Act would address the remaining need.

    -Require every federal agency to demonstrate full compliance with laws protecting the rights of individuals with disabilities. The federal government should be a model of civil rights compliance; each federal agency should demonstrate on an ongoing basis that it respects the rights of people with disabilities. For example, agencies should ensure that newly purchased electronic equipment is compatible with existing assistive technologies such as screen-reading software and Braille display units.

    -Appoint a "Special Assistant to the President for Disability Policy." This staff member would be responsible for implementing my disability agenda and ensuring agency compliance with existing laws.

    -Include people with disabilities in a wide spectrum of executive appointments. Individuals with disabilities provide a valuable perspective on federal policy and contribute immeasurably to the fabric of our nation.

    -Hold a White House Conference on People with Disabilities. This conference would develop a long-term agenda to modernize federal programs serving individuals with disabilities so that they achieve full participation, independent living, economic self-sufficiency and equality of opportunity.

    "My campaign is about restoring community. For too long, individuals with disabilities have been on the outskirts of their communities, unable to fully participate in civic life. Thirteen years ago, Congress enacted the ADA to bring Americans with disabilities into the mainstream. As President, I will work to strengthen the ADA, add new protections, and ensure that disability is no barrier at all to full participation in the American community."

    To read more about Deanıs positions on disability issues, please go to: http://www.deanforamerica.com/pressd_ame/disablericans/2003/07/25/disability_rights_platform/

    John Edwardsı Fact Sheet: Fighting For Americans With Disabilities

    "We're a nation where every person has equal value, every dream deserves an equal chance, and every soul should be as equal in the law of the land as it is in the eyes of God."
    - Senator John Edwards, 6/17/03

    In America, every person should have the chance to live up to his or her potential at work and in our communities. Too often, people with disabilities don't have that opportunity because unfair obstacles get in their way. John Edwards believes we must break down these barriers, and he has a comprehensive agenda to give every American equal opportunity.

    Expand Education and Employment Opportunities

    * Quality education for children with disabilities. The federal government has been funding less than half its share of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Edwards has repeatedly voted to fully fund IDEA, and he believes we must promptly get on the path to full funding so that children with disabilities receive the education they deserve. Edwards also opposes Republican efforts to roll back key provisions of the law. Whether it is denying access to attorneys by putting artificial caps on fees or stripping children with disabilities of civil rights under the guise of reforming discipline rules, we must stop rollbacks of IDEA. And we need stronger enforcement by the Department of Education so children with disabilities receive the education they deserve.

    * Breaking Down Barriers. Students with disabilities often have difficulty finding an internship, the doorway many students use to get a paying job after graduation. Edwards' Breaking Down Barriers initiative will offer resources to enable high school and college students who may not be working today to join the workforce:
    v Give Students Meaningful Job Experiences. Edwards will help students with disabilities in high school and college find internships and entry-level jobs. For high school students, the experience will create a sense of the possibilities in their future and encourage further education. For college students the experience will provide valuable skills and help with finding jobs after graduation.
    v Educate Employers and Opening Doors: Breaking Down Barriers will help eliminate stereotypes and misconceptions about people with disabilities that prevent them from getting work. The program will partner with national business leaders to create opportunities for people with disabilities. Employers who have a positive experience will likely be more willing to hire someone with a disability in the future.
    v Build Partnerships Between Schools, State Support Providers, and Employers: The Breaking Down Barriers initiative will award competitive grants to local agencies already working with people with disabilities: employment networks, state rehabilitation services agencies, community organizations, and school districts. These agencies will run local Breaking Down Barriers programs, build partnerships with businesses and schools, and recruit and place students.

    To read more about Edwardsı positions on disability issues, please go to:
    http://www.johnedwards2004.com/page.asp?id=474

    © 2004 ConnSENSE Bulletin